James, on the other hand, dealt with what people DON'T often like to observe. Yet similarly, his work was controversial, but in its own way. Rather than sexuality, his extreme was violence, or perhaps death. ... In the underlying photo, you can see photo of a Kosovo refugee, taken by James Natchtwey. I pulled this off the website http://www.journeywithjesus.net/Essays/20050314JJ.shtml but it was cited to have ultimately come from Time Magazine.
Kosovo refugee by James Nachtwey. Photo from Life Magazine. |
Judging from this and other works I have seen, James easily can be perceived as cold; someone who is unphasable enough to consistantly work around things this horrific. However, upon watching a video documentary about him in my visual anthropology class, I quickly realized he has a concern for the victims he shoots; in such that he daringly tried to saved one from being beaten to death by a large crowd. I assume his works have the potential to open the eyes of many to how terrible war can be. Perhaps this "dark" job could lead to light.
Either way you go with photography; Lustable celebrities, or mofo's dying, or anything inbetween,.. I reckon it is best to make it your life, because, based on what I learned from the documentaries I have watched, there is alot that can be missed if you don't stay on top of it.
Interesting summary of these two photographers.
ReplyDeleteOddball lady?
And does the second photo come from Time or Life? (The Life link doesn't work...)
How can the methods and work of Leibovitz and Nachtwey help to improve your own photography and visual anthropology?